Assessment of the 2016 Massachusetts Citizens’ Initiative Review Pilot on Question 4

John Gastil; Katherine Knobloch; A. Lee Hannah; Cheryl Maiorca; Ernest Paicopolos; Jennifer Watters

Assessment of the 2016 Massachusetts Citizens’ Initiative Review Pilot on Question 4

John Gastil, Katherine Knobloch, A. Lee Hannah, Cheryl Maiorca, Ernest Paicopolos, Jennifer Watters

Wright State University

Research output: Other contribution

Abstract

This report provides an overall assessment of the quality of deliberation that took place during the 2016 Massachusetts Citizens’ Initiative Review (CIR) pilot project, as well as the quality, utility, and impact of the resultant Citizens’ Statement that review produced. We focus on the 2016 CIR but make reference to earlier findings from our reports that assessed the 2010, 2012, and 2014 CIRs in other locations.

Original language	American English
State	Published - Jan 1 2016

Disciplines

Political Science
Social and Behavioral Sciences

Access to Document

https://sites.psu.edu/citizensinitiativereview/files/2016/12/CIR-2016-Massachusetts-Report-1z9k7np.pdf

Cite this

@misc{51a4ab1fc4ee414d841e1e150b1327ea,

title = "Assessment of the 2016 Massachusetts Citizens{\textquoteright} Initiative Review Pilot on Question 4",

abstract = " This report provides an overall assessment of the quality of deliberation that took place during the 2016 Massachusetts Citizens{\textquoteright} Initiative Review (CIR) pilot project, as well as the quality, utility, and impact of the resultant Citizens{\textquoteright} Statement that review produced. We focus on the 2016 CIR but make reference to earlier findings from our reports that assessed the 2010, 2012, and 2014 CIRs in other locations.",

author = "John Gastil and Katherine Knobloch and Hannah, {A. Lee} and Cheryl Maiorca and Ernest Paicopolos and Jennifer Watters",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

type = "Other",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Assessment of the 2016 Massachusetts Citizens’ Initiative Review Pilot on Question 4

AU - Gastil, John

AU - Knobloch, Katherine

AU - Hannah, A. Lee

AU - Maiorca, Cheryl

AU - Paicopolos, Ernest

AU - Watters, Jennifer

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This report provides an overall assessment of the quality of deliberation that took place during the 2016 Massachusetts Citizens’ Initiative Review (CIR) pilot project, as well as the quality, utility, and impact of the resultant Citizens’ Statement that review produced. We focus on the 2016 CIR but make reference to earlier findings from our reports that assessed the 2010, 2012, and 2014 CIRs in other locations.

AB - This report provides an overall assessment of the quality of deliberation that took place during the 2016 Massachusetts Citizens’ Initiative Review (CIR) pilot project, as well as the quality, utility, and impact of the resultant Citizens’ Statement that review produced. We focus on the 2016 CIR but make reference to earlier findings from our reports that assessed the 2010, 2012, and 2014 CIRs in other locations.

UR - https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/political_science/36

UR - https://sites.psu.edu/citizensinitiativereview/files/2016/12/CIR-2016-Massachusetts-Report-1z9k7np.pdf

M3 - Other contribution

ER -

Assessment of the 2016 Massachusetts Citizens’ Initiative Review Pilot on Question 4

Abstract

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this