Authors' Response: Sequential Unmasking

Dan E. Krane; Simon Ford; Jason R. Gilder; Keith Inman; Allan Jamieson; Roger Koppl; Irving L. Kornfield; D. Michael Risinger; Norah Rudin; Marc Scott Taylor; William C. Thompson

doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.00990.x

Authors' Response: Sequential Unmasking

Dan E. Krane
, Simon Ford
, Jason R. Gilder
, Keith Inman
, Allan Jamieson
, Roger Koppl
, Irving L. Kornfield
, D. Michael Risinger
, Norah Rudin
, Marc Scott Taylor
, William C. Thompson

Biological Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

We agree that there is a need for empirical research on the extent to which (and the circumstances under which) observer effects can influence the interpretation of DNA test results. We also think it would be foolish to assume, in the absence of such research, that observer effects are not a problem for DNA interpretation.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	501
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Forensic Sciences
Volume	54
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.00990.x
State	Published - Mar 2009

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Genetics

Keywords

Comment
Letter to the Editor
Observer effects

Disciplines

Biology
Medical Sciences
Systems Biology

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.00990.xLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{8c868008f476473b8ea01c49c85167f1,

title = "Authors' Response: Sequential Unmasking",

abstract = "We agree that there is a need for empirical research on the extent to which (and the circumstances under which) observer effects can influence the interpretation of DNA test results. We also think it would be foolish to assume, in the absence of such research, that observer effects are not a problem for DNA interpretation.",

keywords = "Comment, Letter to the Editor, Observer effects",

author = "Krane, \{Dan E.\} and Simon Ford and Gilder, \{Jason R.\} and Keith Inman and Allan Jamieson and Roger Koppl and Kornfield, \{Irving L.\} and \{Michael Risinger\}, D. and Norah Rudin and Taylor, \{Marc Scott\} and Thompson, \{William C.\}",

year = "2009",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.00990.x",

language = "English",

volume = "54",

pages = "501",

journal = "Journal of Forensic Sciences",

issn = "0022-1198",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Authors' Response

T2 - Sequential Unmasking

AU - Krane, Dan E.

AU - Ford, Simon

AU - Gilder, Jason R.

AU - Inman, Keith

AU - Jamieson, Allan

AU - Koppl, Roger

AU - Kornfield, Irving L.

AU - Michael Risinger, D.

AU - Rudin, Norah

AU - Taylor, Marc Scott

AU - Thompson, William C.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - We agree that there is a need for empirical research on the extent to which (and the circumstances under which) observer effects can influence the interpretation of DNA test results. We also think it would be foolish to assume, in the absence of such research, that observer effects are not a problem for DNA interpretation.

AB - We agree that there is a need for empirical research on the extent to which (and the circumstances under which) observer effects can influence the interpretation of DNA test results. We also think it would be foolish to assume, in the absence of such research, that observer effects are not a problem for DNA interpretation.

KW - Comment

KW - Letter to the Editor

KW - Observer effects

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/60849123912

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/60849123912#tab=citedBy

UR - https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/biology/235

U2 - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.00990.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.00990.x

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0022-1198

VL - 54

SP - 501

JO - Journal of Forensic Sciences

JF - Journal of Forensic Sciences

IS - 2

ER -

Authors' Response: Sequential Unmasking

Abstract

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this