How Faculty Attitudes and Expectations toward Student Nationality Affect Writing Assessment

Peggy Lindsey, Deborah J. Crusan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Earlier research on assessment suggests that even when Native English Speaker (NSE) and Non-Native English Speaker (NNES) writers make similar errors, faculty tend to assess the NNES writers more harshly. Studies indicate that evaluators may be particularly severe when grading NNES writers holistically. In an effort to provide more recent data on how faculty perceive student writers based on their nationalities, researchers at two medium-sized Midwestern universities surveyed and conducted interviews with faculty to determine if such discrepancies continue to exist between assessments of international and American writers, to identify what preconceptions faculty may have regarding international writers, and to explore how these notions may affect their assessment of such writers. Results indicate that while faculty continue to rate international writers lower when scoring analytically, they consistently evaluate those same writers higher when scoring holistically.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalAcross the Disciplines: A Journal of Language, Learning, and Academic Writing
Volume8
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Disciplines

  • Arts and Humanities
  • English Language and Literature
  • Higher Education
  • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning

Cite this