Abstract
Earlier research on assessment suggests that even when Native English Speaker (NSE) and Non-Native English Speaker (NNES) writers make similar errors, faculty tend to assess the NNES writers more harshly. Studies indicate that evaluators may be particularly severe when grading NNES writers holistically. In an effort to provide more recent data on how faculty perceive student writers based on their nationalities, researchers at two medium-sized Midwestern universities surveyed and conducted interviews with faculty to determine if such discrepancies continue to exist between assessments of international and American writers, to identify what preconceptions faculty may have regarding international writers, and to explore how these notions may affect their assessment of such writers. Results indicate that while faculty continue to rate international writers lower when scoring analytically, they consistently evaluate those same writers higher when scoring holistically.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Journal | Across the Disciplines: A Journal of Language, Learning, and Academic Writing |
Volume | 8 |
State | Published - Jan 1 2011 |
Disciplines
- Arts and Humanities
- English Language and Literature
- Higher Education
- Scholarship of Teaching and Learning