Abstract
In Humane Society of the United States v. Jewell, a federal district court invalidated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) delisting of wolves in the western Great Lakes (WGL) Distinct Population Segment. This decision culminated a long history of litigation over wolves in the WGL region, and has generated a political backlash, with congressional attempts to delist wolves and to weaken the ESA itself. The author argues that the Jewell court's analysis is erroneous on several central legal issues. As a policy matter, delisting the WGL wolves and returning them to state control should increase social tolerance of wolves, which is key to the long-term survival of the wolf.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Journal | Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis |
Volume | 46 |
State | Published - Jan 1 2016 |
Keywords
- Humane Society v Jewell
- Wildlife conservation--Law and legislation--United States
- Wildlife conservation--Law and legislation--United States—Cases
- Wolves--Law and legislation--Rocky Mountain region
Disciplines
- Animal Law
- Environmental Law
- Law
- Political Science
- Social and Behavioral Sciences