Incentives For Teaching Psychiatry

David Bienenfeld; Ronald Markert; John Rudisill; Paulette Gillig; James A. Bourgeois; William Klykylo; Brenda J Roman; Barbara Warner; Jerald Kay

doi:10.1007/BF03341904

Incentives For Teaching Psychiatry

David Bienenfeld, Ronald Markert, John Rudisill, Paulette Gillig, James A. Bourgeois, William Klykylo, Brenda J Roman, Barbara Warner, Jerald Kay

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

A questionnaire was sent to chairs and faculty in 137 academic departments of psychiatry regarding the methods used to promote teaching and their perceived value. The incentives most often used included promotion and retention, nomination to committees, and peer recognition. Least often used were bonuses and a designated teachers’ career track. Chairs and their faculty often disagreed as to whether some incentives were being used at all Recognition of teaching excellence was generally most highly valued as a useful incentive. Clarification of the nature and purpose of teaching incentives would likely improve their effectiveness.

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	91-97
Journal	Academic Psychiatry
Volume	21
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03341904
State	Published - Jan 18 1997

Keywords

Medical Student
Academic Psychiatry
Residency Training
Teaching Skill
Resident Teaching

Disciplines

Higher Education
Internal Medicine
Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Medical Education
Psychiatry

Access to Document

10.1007/BF03341904License: CC BY

Cite this

@article{45ed25a5d1be41e48c5f10542a2baf6b,

title = "Incentives For Teaching Psychiatry",

abstract = " A questionnaire was sent to chairs and faculty in 137 academic departments of psychiatry regarding the methods used to promote teaching and their perceived value. The incentives most often used included promotion and retention, nomination to committees, and peer recognition. Least often used were bonuses and a designated teachers{\textquoteright} career track. Chairs and their faculty often disagreed as to whether some incentives were being used at all Recognition of teaching excellence was generally most highly valued as a useful incentive. Clarification of the nature and purpose of teaching incentives would likely improve their effectiveness.",

keywords = "Medical Student, Academic Psychiatry, Residency Training, Teaching Skill, Resident Teaching",

author = "David Bienenfeld and Ronald Markert and John Rudisill and Paulette Gillig and Bourgeois, {James A.} and William Klykylo and Roman, {Brenda J} and Barbara Warner and Jerald Kay",

year = "1997",

month = jan,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1007/BF03341904",

language = "American English",

volume = "21",

pages = "91--97",

journal = "Academic Psychiatry",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incentives For Teaching Psychiatry

AU - Bienenfeld, David

AU - Markert, Ronald

AU - Rudisill, John

AU - Gillig, Paulette

AU - Bourgeois, James A.

AU - Klykylo, William

AU - Roman, Brenda J

AU - Warner, Barbara

AU - Kay, Jerald

PY - 1997/1/18

Y1 - 1997/1/18

N2 - A questionnaire was sent to chairs and faculty in 137 academic departments of psychiatry regarding the methods used to promote teaching and their perceived value. The incentives most often used included promotion and retention, nomination to committees, and peer recognition. Least often used were bonuses and a designated teachers’ career track. Chairs and their faculty often disagreed as to whether some incentives were being used at all Recognition of teaching excellence was generally most highly valued as a useful incentive. Clarification of the nature and purpose of teaching incentives would likely improve their effectiveness.

AB - A questionnaire was sent to chairs and faculty in 137 academic departments of psychiatry regarding the methods used to promote teaching and their perceived value. The incentives most often used included promotion and retention, nomination to committees, and peer recognition. Least often used were bonuses and a designated teachers’ career track. Chairs and their faculty often disagreed as to whether some incentives were being used at all Recognition of teaching excellence was generally most highly valued as a useful incentive. Clarification of the nature and purpose of teaching incentives would likely improve their effectiveness.

KW - Medical Student

KW - Academic Psychiatry

KW - Residency Training

KW - Teaching Skill

KW - Resident Teaching

UR - https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/med_education/53

U2 - 10.1007/BF03341904

DO - 10.1007/BF03341904

M3 - Article

C2 - 24442846

VL - 21

SP - 91

EP - 97

JO - Academic Psychiatry

JF - Academic Psychiatry

ER -

Incentives For Teaching Psychiatry

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this