TY - GEN
T1 - Pain Intensity Assessment in Sickle Cell Disease Patients Using Vital Signs During Hospital Visits
AU - Padhee, Swati
AU - Alambo, Amanuel
AU - Banerjee, Tanvi
AU - Subramaniam, Arvind
AU - Abrams, Daniel M.
AU - Nave, Gary K.
AU - Shah, Nirmish
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is often associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high healthcare costs. The standard method for predicting the absence, presence, and intensity of pain has long been self-report. However, medical providers struggle to manage patients based on subjective pain reports correctly and pain medications often lead to further difficulties in patient communication as they may cause sedation and sleepiness. Recent studies have shown that objective physiological measures can predict subjective self-reported pain scores for inpatient visits using machine learning (ML) techniques. In this study, we evaluate the generalizability of ML techniques to data collected from 50 patients over an extended period across three types of hospital visits (i.e., inpatient, outpatient and outpatient evaluation). We compare five classification algorithms for various pain intensity levels at both intra-individual (within each patient) and inter-individual (between patients) level. While all the tested classifiers perform much better than chance, a Decision Tree (DT) model performs best at predicting pain on an 11-point severity scale (from 0–10) with an accuracy of 0.728 at an inter-individual level and 0.653 at an intra-individual level. The accuracy of DT significantly improves to 0.941 on a 2-point rating scale (i.e., no/mild pain: 0–5, severe pain: 6–10) at an inter-individual level. Our experimental results demonstrate that ML techniques can provide an objective and quantitative evaluation of pain intensity levels for all three types of hospital visits.
AB - Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is often associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high healthcare costs. The standard method for predicting the absence, presence, and intensity of pain has long been self-report. However, medical providers struggle to manage patients based on subjective pain reports correctly and pain medications often lead to further difficulties in patient communication as they may cause sedation and sleepiness. Recent studies have shown that objective physiological measures can predict subjective self-reported pain scores for inpatient visits using machine learning (ML) techniques. In this study, we evaluate the generalizability of ML techniques to data collected from 50 patients over an extended period across three types of hospital visits (i.e., inpatient, outpatient and outpatient evaluation). We compare five classification algorithms for various pain intensity levels at both intra-individual (within each patient) and inter-individual (between patients) level. While all the tested classifiers perform much better than chance, a Decision Tree (DT) model performs best at predicting pain on an 11-point severity scale (from 0–10) with an accuracy of 0.728 at an inter-individual level and 0.653 at an intra-individual level. The accuracy of DT significantly improves to 0.941 on a 2-point rating scale (i.e., no/mild pain: 0–5, severe pain: 6–10) at an inter-individual level. Our experimental results demonstrate that ML techniques can provide an objective and quantitative evaluation of pain intensity levels for all three types of hospital visits.
KW - Pain intensity quantification
KW - Pain pattern identification
KW - Physiological signals
KW - Sickle cell anemia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110732481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110732481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/cse/633
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-68790-8_7
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-68790-8_7
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85110732481
SN - 9783030687892
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
SP - 77
EP - 85
BT - Pattern Recognition
A2 - Del Bimbo, Alberto
A2 - Bertini, Marco
A2 - Sclaroff, Stan
A2 - Mei, Tao
A2 - Escalante, Hugo Jair
A2 - Cucchiara, Rita
A2 - Vezzani, Roberto
A2 - Farinella, Giovanni Maria
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Workshops, ICPR 2020
Y2 - 10 January 2021 through 15 January 2021
ER -