Peer review process of the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Anne Victoria Neale, Marjorie A. Bowman

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

Abstract

With this issue, the Journal of the American Board of Family Practice officially changes its name to the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine . The JABFM is a peer-reviewed journal that is indebted to the hundreds of experts who donate their time to critically appraise articles submitted for publication consideration. Peer reviewed articles are considered highly credible because they have undergone scrutiny by experts with particular knowledge in the topic. Peer review is critical in the editorial process because editors do not have the time or expertise to evaluate all aspects of each submission. The primary aims of peer review are 2-fold: to decide whether or not an article should be published (based on quality and relevance to the journal), and to improve the article before publication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-210
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Keywords

  • family medicine

Disciplines

  • Community Health
  • Community Health and Preventive Medicine
  • Family Medicine
  • Medicine and Health Sciences
  • Mental and Social Health
  • Public Health

Cite this