TY - GEN
T1 - Searching for the Model of Common Ground in Human-Computer Dialogue
AU - Rothwell, Clayton D.
AU - Shalin, Valerie L.
AU - Romigh, Griffin D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Natural language dialogue is a desirable method for human-robot interaction and human-computer interaction. Critical to the success of dialogue is the underlying model for common ground and the grounding process that establishes, adds to, and repairs shared understanding. The model of grounding for human-computer interaction should be informed by human-human dialogue. However, the processes involved in human-human grounding are under dispute within the research community. Three models have been proposed: alignment, a simple model that has been influential on dialogue system development, interpersonal synergy, an automatic coordination emerging from interaction, and perspective taking, a strategic interaction based on intentional coordination. Few studies have simultaneously evaluated these models. We tested the models’ ability to account for human-human performance in a complex collaborative task that stressed the grounding process. The results supported the perspective taking model over the synergy model and the alignment model, indicating the need to reassess the alignment model as a foundation for human-computer interaction.
AB - Natural language dialogue is a desirable method for human-robot interaction and human-computer interaction. Critical to the success of dialogue is the underlying model for common ground and the grounding process that establishes, adds to, and repairs shared understanding. The model of grounding for human-computer interaction should be informed by human-human dialogue. However, the processes involved in human-human grounding are under dispute within the research community. Three models have been proposed: alignment, a simple model that has been influential on dialogue system development, interpersonal synergy, an automatic coordination emerging from interaction, and perspective taking, a strategic interaction based on intentional coordination. Few studies have simultaneously evaluated these models. We tested the models’ ability to account for human-human performance in a complex collaborative task that stressed the grounding process. The results supported the perspective taking model over the synergy model and the alignment model, indicating the need to reassess the alignment model as a foundation for human-computer interaction.
KW - Common ground
KW - Dialogue
KW - Human-computer interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051814557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051814557&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/psychology/548
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-96059-3_4
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-96059-3_4
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9783319960586
T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
SP - 33
EP - 42
BT - Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) - Volume X
A2 - Alexander, Thomas
A2 - Bagnara, Sebastiano
A2 - Tartaglia, Riccardo
A2 - Albolino, Sara
A2 - Fujita, Yushi
PB - Springer Verlag
T2 - 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA 2018
Y2 - 26 August 2018 through 30 August 2018
ER -