Abstract
Flach, Smith, Dittman, & Stanard's (2003) hypothesis that a linear weighting of optical angle and expansion rate are used as a criterion for braking is evaluated in a simple driving task. The task required participants to drive from an initial stationary position to a full stop at a comfortable distance in front of a stationary obstacle. The simulated vehicle was controlled with an accelerator and a brake. Acceleration and deceleration were proportional to displacement of these controls. Results showed that people's critical actions (releasing the accelerator and initiating the brake) corresponded with a Tau criterion (constant ratio of angle and expansion rate). Time histories suggest that people were adopting non-proportional, discrete control strategies that approached time optimal, bang-bang control.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2004 |
Event | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting - Duration: Sep 1 2004 → … |
Conference
Conference | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting |
---|---|
Period | 9/1/04 → … |
Disciplines
- Psychology
- Social and Behavioral Sciences